Feijóo Critiques 2025 Judicial Year Opening, Calls King's Attendance a 'Mistake'

Alberto Núñez Feijóo criticizes the King's presence at the 2025 judicial year opening, calling it a 'mistake' amid institutional tensions.

Key Points

  • • Feijóo labels the judicial year opening as an 'institutional collision.'
  • • Criticizes the King's involvement as a 'serious error.'
  • • Highlights tensions between the branches of government and their independence.
  • • Raises concerns about governmental interference in judicial matters.

In a sharp critique of the 2025 judicial year opening ceremony, Alberto Núñez Feijóo, the leader of Spain's People's Party (PP), labeled the event as a sign of "institutional collision" and questioned the appropriateness of King Felipe VI's presence. Feijóo accused government officials of furthering tensions between the judiciary and the executive branch, stating that such involvement from the monarchy in judicial matters is unwarranted and represents a serious error in judgment.

Feijóo's remarks come amid growing concerns about the relationship between Spain's different governmental branches, reflecting a lack of harmony in the political landscape. The event, which traditionally symbolizes the start of the judicial year, has drawn criticism not only for the King's participation but also for the perceived interference from the ruling coalition, raising alarms about the independence of the judiciary.

He remarked, "It's a mistake for the King to be present when there is such existing tension between the branches of government." His statements underscore an ongoing debate surrounding the role of the monarchy and the expected neutrality of judicial proceedings in Spain's democratic framework.

As the opening event proceeded, discussions among officials and political analysts highlight the critical tone being adopted by opposition leaders like Feijóo, who are increasingly vocal about perceived governmental overreach into judicial matters. This controversy marks a significant moment in Spanish political discourse as tensions between state institutions remain at the forefront of national conversation.