Vox's Controversial Ban on Islamic Practices Sparks Legal and Community Backlash in Jumilla
Political and community reactions intensify over Vox's proposed ban on Islamic practices in Jumilla.
Key Points
- • Vox's initial ban proposal rejected by PP in Congress.
- • PP later approved public celebration limits for Muslim festivals in Jumilla.
- • Legal experts question the constitutionality of the measures.
- • Local Muslim community expresses devastation and confusion.
In a significant political development, Vox's proposed ban on Islamic religious celebrations in Jumilla, Spain, has stirred considerable controversy and legal scrutiny. During a recent discussion in Congress, the Popular Party (PP) rejected a similar proposal from Vox that aimed to prohibit public prayers for Eid al-Adha, the Islamic veil, and the teaching of Moroccan culture in schools. PP representative Sofía Acedo labeled Vox's initiative as divisive, aimed at segregating cultural communities, leading to a split in support, with Vox receiving backing solely from its 33 deputies.
Despite the rejection at the national level, a month later, the PP moved forward with an amendment in Jumilla that restricts public celebrations of significant Islamic festivals, particularly in municipal facilities. Juan Agustín Carrillo, Vox's spokesperson in Jumilla, justified the decision by stating that public spaces should focus on their intended purposes like sports, downplaying accusations of infringing on religious freedoms.
However, this measure has triggered a backlash from the local Muslim community, which expressed devastation over the veto. Legal experts are now questioning the constitutionality of banning these practices, suggesting that such actions could violate the fundamental rights protected by the Spanish Constitution. Many in the Muslim community are bewildered, asking, "What damage do we do by praying together just one day a year?" This incident has heightened tensions around immigration and religious freedoms within the region, marking a noteworthy shift in the PP's policy alignment towards the far-right's approach.