Yolanda Díaz and Coalition Ministers Denounce Supreme Court Ruling Against Attorney General as Politically Motivated
Spain's Vice President Yolanda Díaz and coalition ministers criticize the Supreme Court ruling against Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz as politically driven and an attack on the government and judicial independence.
- • Yolanda Díaz calls the Supreme Court ruling against Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz politically motivated and lacking evidence.
- • The two-year disqualification sentence was announced on the anniversary of Franco’s death, suggesting political intent.
- • Coalition ministers label the ruling an attack on the government and the separation of powers.
- • Díaz and others defend García Ortiz as a brilliant jurist and decry the fracture caused in the judiciary.
Key details
Yolanda Díaz, Spain's Second Vice President, fiercely criticized the Supreme Court's ruling against Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz, calling it a politically motivated decision aimed at destabilizing the progressive coalition government. Speaking at a press event in Slovenia on November 21, 2025, Díaz described the sentence—a two-year disqualification related to García Ortiz's disclosure of secrets in a case involving businessman Alberto González Amador—as an "anomaly" that lacked solid evidence and fractured the Spanish judiciary, citing dissenting votes within the court.
Díaz defended García Ortiz as a "brilliant jurist" and condemned the ruling for breaking the institutional integrity of the state. She highlighted the coincidence of the court's judgment becoming public on November 20, the anniversary of Franco's death, suggesting this timing was not accidental and underscoring political motivations behind the tribunal's action.
Other members of the coalition government echoed Díaz's condemnation. Culture Minister Ernest Urtasun accused the judicial right of wanting to protect Community of Madrid President Isabel Díaz Ayuso and undermine the national government through the ruling. Youth and Childhood Minister Sira Rego condemned the verdict for violating the separation of powers, while Health Minister Mónica García described the ruling as a "lethal blow" to the presumption of innocence.
Together, these political leaders framed the Supreme Court's decision as an attack not just on García Ortiz but on judicial independence and the coalition government's stability, emphasizing the ruling’s broader implications for Spanish democracy.
The controversy has sparked a significant political backlash, with Díaz insisting the case against García Ortiz will be studied in legal circles for years due to its exceptional nature. The intensified criticism from prominent coalition figures signals ongoing tensions between the progressive government and segments of the judiciary viewed as politically conservative.
This article was synthesized and translated from native language sources to provide English-speaking readers with local perspectives.